A Cure For Capitakism

[LITE-INN]

No, I look at the primary reasons, you look at the results. It's like finding a cure or giving aspirin for the fever. look at these. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM This one should suit you. It's one of your FOX heroes. This is why he is no longer there. He is lucky to be alive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB5LK-jihgk Long but award winning documentary. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkq2...PglmQ&index=56 there are tons more just look at the play lists on the side.

with glenn beck heaven for bid we can't have truth coming out can we

[LITE-INN]

he's flipping liberal marxist that thinks his sh1t don't stink capitalism is obsolete bs its been going on for years

[mudslinger47]

Ya think nobody is that stupid, then tnie speaks, and you realise you're wrong....

[Bubstr]

Quote Originally Posted by Bubstr View Post
No, I look at the primary reasons, you look at the results. It's like finding a cure or giving aspirin for the fever. look at these. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM This one should suit you. It's one of your FOX heroes. This is why he is no longer there. He is lucky to be alive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB5LK-jihgk Long but award winning documentary. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkq2...PglmQ&index=56 there are tons more just look at the play lists on the side.

with glenn beck heaven for bid we can't have truth coming out can we

You continuing education is looking up. We got you to open the book. You realized it was Glen Beck. Now all you have to do is read a few of them.

I would even agree that Glen Beck, if not Marxist is some what against unregulated Capitalism. he also would slant any issue to gain TV ratings. Other than that, If you can not look at anything someone says and sort out fact from fabrication, there is no hope for your education. Even someone you disagree with, can not be wrong 100% of the time and someone you agree with can not be right 100% of the time. You where given a choice to search for the subject being discussed, so choice of source shouldn't be a problem.

So what do YOU think about the FED and fractional reserve banking?

[Bubstr]

Well, I'll be darned, got 2 atta boy rep stars, to offset the red ones. No comment. Leave your name next time, so I can say thank you.

[t.nie]

I've given you my ideas and facts SEVERAL TIMES and you always discount it and question the source. If it doesn't come out of Obama, Reid, or Pelosi's mouth it's WRONG in your mind.
In case you forgot, these are YOUR replies:

"Your claims have been investigated and all of the lies you have been told stem from basically one source-a right wing conversative "

"So, another stupid conspiracy theory that Forbes made" a headline out of and YOU bought into hook line and sinker"

"More exaggerated BS from the right wingers"

"Here we go again, more talking points from the right wing hate machine"

"you're way too far gone following the "conspiracy gospel" of Beck. All hail the Prophet Beck"

"Another MANUFACTURED criticism, instigated by Hannity"

"your stupid asinine ridiculous crap that his being black protects him" - (AHHH, THE RACE CARD, THERE IT IS !!!!!)

Rush He's the guy that just blows hot air and BS that "sounds good" to people like you who need to be spoon fed their opinions.

"stick to your outdated, backwards Neanderthal convictions"

"some spin master somewhere in the right wing hate machine came up with the wildly ridiculous $634 milllion number"

And I could post many, many more but why waste my time on you?
You're too far gone worshipping your Messiah for anyone to help.
Have a nice day!

Quite frankly, taking one line from one essay and putting it with another line from another essay and claiming it proves something is about the lamest, weakest attempt I have ever seen on here to prove anything.

Here's a hint-- You can't take single lines out of context and create your own interpretation and then claim it's what the author intended. Doesn't work that way. If you were writing an article for a newspaper or other publication, you would be sued for misrepresenting the person or their ideas under the Mosaic Doctrine. If you tried to pull this crap in an organized debate, you would get called out for taking things out of context.

Bascially to anyone with an advanced education, you just proved you don't know how to go about winning a debate. You just lost again. Keep posting though, your audience in the peanut gallery thinks you're winning.

[LITE-INN]

Quote Originally Posted by Bubstr View Post No, I look at the primary reasons, you look at the results. It's like finding a cure or giving aspirin for the fever. look at these. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM This one should suit you. It's one of your FOX heroes. This is why he is no longer there. He is lucky to be alive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB5LK-jihgk Long but award winning documentary. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkq2...PglmQ&index=56 there are tons more just look at the play lists on the side. You continuing education is looking up. We got you to open the book. You realized it was Glen Beck. Now all you have to do is read a few of them. I would even agree that Glen Beck, if not Marxist is some what against unregulated Capitalism. he also would slant any issue to gain TV ratings. Other than that, If you can not look at anything someone says and sort out fact from fabrication, there is no hope for your education. Even someone you disagree with, can not be wrong 100% of the time and someone you agree with can not be right 100% of the time. You where given a choice to search for the subject being discussed, so choice of source shouldn't be a problem. So what do YOU think about the FED and fractional reserve banking?

so you saying that glen beck is doing a he11 of a job unlike tnies good friend doing sports I guess he can't screw that up

[Bubstr]

so you saying that glen beck is doing a he11 of a job unlike tnies good friend doing sports I guess he can't screw that up

What I'm saying, is even a blind squirrel picks up a acorn once in a while. In your case the problem is compounded with a bad case of dumb.

[Bubstr]

Our monetary system is unconstitutional????????????

You are beginning to live in some fantasy world. How long has it been illegal and let's have your "better idea"!!!

Have you looked into the constitutionality of our money yet? Look at coinage must be Silver and gold and the only ones allowed to borrow money is congress. The FED printing money for the QE programs is borrowing money with out the approval of congress. If it wasn't borrowing, we wouldn't have the debt. The producing of fiat money is not silver or gold. When Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard, he trashed the constitution.

I'm not saying the gold standard is the bomb. It is far from it. It would be too easy to corner the gold market. Adding silver to it would be somewhat better, but not actually the root of our problem. What the money is backed by isn't as important as who issues money and how much is issued and how it gets distributed.

Every dollar issued today is backed by only our promise to pay. Our bonds that are debt for new money are only backed with our promise to pay the money back with interest. If we went constitutional on the FED and started printing our own money with the very same promise to pay backing, we would remove interest and fees for bond distribution and have the choice of how money gets to the economy. It no longer would have to go threw reserve banks and intern loans that suck money out of the system. At the same time you destroy reserve notes you replace then with free notes and as the percentage of notes change the fractional reserve requirements are increased until all loans are real money. When the reserve notes are gone, a bank would have to have a dollar to lend a dollar. The interest rate would be controlled by how much money is made. This would take some time to do, so as not to disrupt the economy, but note how long it took for the FED to get us in the mess we are in today. Seems like 100 years. Really it was 100 years and the contract renewal for the FED should come up this year. Funny we haven't seen anything about it. 1913 - 2013 Maybe we should see just whom we are awarding this contract, that controls the country, to. We don't really know who owns the FED.

[Clayton_Wetter]

Quote Originally Posted by Bubstr View Post
No, I look at the primary reasons, you look at the results. It's like finding a cure or giving aspirin for the fever. look at these. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tGk5ioEXlIM This one should suit you. It's one of your FOX heroes. This is why he is no longer there. He is lucky to be alive. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vB5LK-jihgk Long but award winning documentary. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkq2...PglmQ&index=56 there are tons more just look at the play lists on the side.



You continuing education is looking up. We got you to open the book. You realized it was Glen Beck. Now all you have to do is read a few of them.

I would even agree that Glen Beck, if not Marxist is some what against unregulated Capitalism. he also would slant any issue to gain TV ratings. Other than that, If you can not look at anything someone says and sort out fact from fabrication, there is no hope for your education. Even someone you disagree with, can not be wrong 100% of the time and someone you agree with can not be right 100% of the time. You where given a choice to search for the subject being discussed, so choice of source shouldn't be a problem.

So what do YOU think about the FED and fractional reserve banking?

What did Glenn do, bad mouth a Libetarian? Did you watch his show with Ron Paul on it the other night? It's a shame you think so negatively about everything/everyone. Just who and what do you stand for? All I see is putdowns to any of us who stand for Conservatism. Is that our problem, to you? And as far as thinking Beck is just out there for the money, you are 100% dead wrong. But I know you won't believe that either.

[Clayton_Wetter]

Have you looked into the constitutionality of our money yet? Look at coinage must be Silver and gold and the only ones allowed to borrow money is congress. The FED printing money for the QE programs is borrowing money with out the approval of congress. If it wasn't borrowing, we wouldn't have the debt. The producing of fiat money is not silver or gold. When Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard, he trashed the constitution.

I'm not saying the gold standard is the bomb. It is far from it. It would be too easy to corner the gold market. Adding silver to it would be somewhat better, but not actually the root of our problem. What the money is backed by isn't as important as who issues money and how much is issued and how it gets distributed.

Every dollar issued today is backed by only our promise to pay. Our bonds that are debt for new money are only backed with our promise to pay the money back with interest. If we went constitutional on the FED and started printing our own money with the very same promise to pay backing, we would remove interest and fees for bond distribution and have the choice of how money gets to the economy. It no longer would have to go threw reserve banks and intern loans that suck money out of the system. At the same time you destroy reserve notes you replace then with free notes and as the percentage of notes change the fractional reserve requirements are increased until all loans are real money. When the reserve notes are gone, a bank would have to have a dollar to lend a dollar. The interest rate would be controlled by how much money is made. This would take some time to do, so as not to disrupt the economy, but note how long it took for the FED to get us in the mess we are in today. Seems like 100 years. Really it was 100 years and the contract renewal for the FED should come up this year. Funny we haven't seen anything about it. 1913 - 2013 Maybe we should see just whom we are awarding this contract, that controls the country, to. We don't really know who owns the FED.

Who allows all of this to happen? Look at the White House first. Then "google" the senate and congress, and see how each votes or refrains from voting on all issues and bills. You can not clean up this nation without cleaning up it's government first. But go ahead and bad mouth Cruz and Lee.

commieblaster.com

[Bubstr]

What did Glenn do, bad mouth a Libetarian? Did you watch his show with Ron Paul on it the other night? It's a shame you think so negatively about everything/everyone. Just who and what do you stand for? All I see is putdowns to any of us who stand for Conservatism. Is that our problem, to you? And as far as thinking Beck is just out there for the money, you are 100% dead wrong. But I know you won't believe that either.

Lite inn was complaining about the source I put out. It was Beck. When it comes to Washington and the media that covers then, there is a lot to complain about. The difference between you and I is I have no favorites and am a equal opportunity media basher. None of them are right or wrong 100% of the time and that are all about ratings.

[Bubstr]

Who allows all of this to happen? Look at the White House first. Then "google" the senate and congress, and see how each votes or refrains from voting on all issues and bills. You can not clean up this nation without cleaning up it's government first. But go ahead and bad mouth Cruz and Lee.

commieblaster.com

Your right we can not fix the country until we fix Washington. The next election is a mid term election, not a presidential election. Start by removing all incumbents. Replace them with independents if possible the opposite party if need be. You fair haired boys are nothing special. I've seen guys like that come and go. They where put up for election by the republican party. The republican party or the democratic party is not your friend. they are business as usual. If these whiny tea baggers had not sold out to the republican party, I'd take a serious look at them. These political parties have been the problem since they began. You no longer have a choice of candidates. They are picked by less than 20% of the population. That is not what the founders of this country had in mind. They gerrymander, they stuff the good old boys in the primaries, they have taken your republic by selling it to the highest bidder and one complains about the other because they did it better. I've got a great Idea. Let's just put all the congressional seats and the presidency on EBay and sell them to the highest bidder. Cut out the middle men and use the proceeds to reduce the deficit.

[mudslinger47]

What it boils down to is the Republican party has to be taken away from the eastern blue bloods. Tho ole GOP is where the issue is. Get more of the Cruz/Lee types in the Senate and take the leadership away from the Democrat lites in the Republican party and they'll pack their own crap and leave, they're only there for the power, take that away, they leave. Not all the TP has gone Republican, matter of fact hardly any of the grassroots..There are so called TP spokes people in DC, and thats the problem, their in DC. If your not hearing from the hinterlands, you're not necessarily hearing the truth.

[Bubstr]

What it boils down to is the Republican party has to be taken away from the eastern blue bloods. Tho ole GOP is where the issue is. Get more of the Cruz/Lee types in the Senate and take the leadership away from the Democrat lites in the Republican party and they'll pack their own crap and leave, they're only there for the power, take that away, they leave. Not all the TP has gone Republican, matter of fact hardly any of the grassroots..There are so called TP spokes people in DC, and thats the problem, their in DC. If your not hearing from the hinterlands, you're not necessarily hearing the truth.

My first election was 1964 that I could vote. I've seen these talkers come and go. I don't want to hear from them, I want results. Talk is cheap. Talk talk talk and nothing changes.

Listen to what they are saying. You can not reduce spending to get the US out of debt anymore than you can borrow us out of debt. If you even spend less that you pay in this system, it has a bad effect on the economy. It takes circulating money out of the economy. I think they know this because when the sequester when into effect, the first thing one of them was yelling we can't cut defense. hey knew the left would stand up for social cuts. That meant no real cuts.