Benghazi investigation results

[kidrock]

They can't see it Kid!! They would be better off breaking from the name Republican Party and start a third party! Maybe the Tea Party. They are crushing the very party they stood for years ago. They believe the country is extremely right! When in reality, it's centered! Moderate Dems or Moderate Republicans is where the majority is at! But, they want to keep pushing farther and farther right on all the issues and they can't see it's hurting them. It's not 1950 anymore. Sometimes the truth hurts. It's Sad

No kidding what's funny they always run on a extreme right platform and when they win the nomination they start back tracking a lot of what they say because they know if they don't they won't win. Yeah they don't know the truth.

[kidrock]

whats the use the media is in bed with the democrats always have been a try to deny that one mud duck

That I have to agree with, but, it's really the elitist that control the media and they don't like Trump and want Hillary to be the president. Why do you think Clinton got a pass.

[old fan]

its that are look at the missing/ dead people that's been involved with the killer usa today said very little about Hillary but all kinds of crap on trump with a casino are you kidding me I won't pick that pos for toilet paper

[kidrock]

Here's something I don't understand. The donald said Saddam was a very very bad guy but, was good at killing terroist but, yet the media wants us to think he supports Saddam. her's the kicker, I thought bush told us Saddam was a supporter of terroist. Which one is it?

[mudslinger47]

Here's something I don't understand. The donald said Saddam was a very very bad guy but, was good at killing terroist but, yet the media wants us to think he supports Saddam. her's the kicker, I thought bush told us Saddam was a supporter of terroist. Which one is it?

First, disregard what the media says.. they have a narritive that they are pushing.... ignor them... secondly, its a clear difference of opinion... Trump was against going into Iraq, "W" wasn't... "W" had intel that Trump didn't know about so its hard to say who was right.... Personelly, if Bush 41 could have go in and finished them off we would have been a lot better off, BUT that is not what congress said he could do.... He went as far as he was allowed by congress... Go back and check who was running congres and you'll see who sold us up the river that time....

[kidrock]

First, disregard what the media says.. they have a narritive that they are pushing.... ignor them... secondly, its a clear difference of opinion... Trump was against going into Iraq, "W" wasn't... "W" had intel that Trump didn't know about so its hard to say who was right.... Personelly, if Bush 41 could have go in and finished them off we would have been a lot better off, BUT that is not what congress said he could do.... He went as far as he was allowed by congress... Go back and check who was running congres and you'll see who sold us up the river that time....

I believe it was the right call back then but, it wasn't the right call for Bush2, should have never been in the war with Iraq. should have stayed in AFGHANISTAN and got Bin Ladden.

[mudslinger47]

I believe it was the right call back then but, it wasn't the right call for Bush2, should have never been in the war with Iraq. should have stayed in AFGHANISTAN and got Bin Ladden.

If 41 could have finished the job, there may not have been a second reason... we just won't know, ever....

[kidrock]

If 41 could have finished the job, there may not have been a second reason... we just won't know, ever....

That's right we will never know but, we kept Saddam in check after the first Iraq war. he was no threat to this country.

[old fan]

us was the police of the world now its something else with a p

[old fan]

I would n't trust the media as far as I could throw them

[mud duck]

That's right we will never know but, we kept Saddam in check after the first Iraq war. he was no threat to this country.

Now now Kid, George and Di ckie said Sadam had WMDs!! If a Republicsn says something it's the truth!! Only those pesky liberals lie. Wink

[skids]

Now now Kid, George and Di ckie said Sadam had WMDs!! If a Republicsn says something it's the truth!! Only those pesky liberals lie. Wink

Funny how you WMDers always leave out what the democrats were saying....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjcofMFHsA

But, hey, if you want to think it was ONLY the Republicans..... it's a free country (for now). You have every right to pure ignorance. The facts are right there in front of you, but you are free to ignore them. Wink.

Carry on.

[kidrock]

Funny how you WMDers always leave out what the democrats were saying....

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnjcofMFHsA

But, hey, if you want to think it was ONLY the Republicans..... it's a free country (for now). You have every right to pure ignorance. The facts are right there in front of you, but you are free to ignore them. Wink.

Carry on.

What I have been saying was the Bush Administartion knew all a long that Saddam did not have WMD's but, scewed the Intellagance report to sell to the American public that they did in fact have them and that they were a threat to this country which was all false. Saddam was no threat to this country and from the mouth of the Republican nominee Sadamm was good at killing terroist so, no terroist in Iraq like the Bush Administration sold us or is the Donald lying? anyone know which one it it?

Your right can't ignore what the Dems were saying as well.

[skids]

What I have been saying was the Bush Administartion knew all a long that Saddam did not have WMD's but, scewed the Intellagance report to sell to the American public that they did in fact have them and that they were a threat to this country which was all false. Saddam was no threat to this country and from the mouth of the Republican nominee Sadamm was good at killing terroist so, no terroist in Iraq like the Bush Administration sold us or is the Donald lying? anyone know which one it it?

Your right can't ignore what the Dems were saying as well.

Please post your evidence that "the Bush administration knew all along" and how all those in the chain of intelligence went along with falsifying intelligence. How were all those "smart" democrats duped?

Correct me if I'm wrong. The President doesn't compose the intelligence reports. They are provided to him daily. So, what did he do? Say, "here is what I want the intelligence reports to say tomorrow...."????

We hear this all the time, along with it was a "war for oil". Yet nobody has ever sited evidence of them knowing nor any oil we got as a result of the war.

None of the deniers ever want to acknowledge the fact that Saddam DID USE WMDs on his own people. So, to say there "never were WMDs" is ridiculous in itself.

[formercrewguy]

Bill Clinton said Iraq had WMD's when he was still President. Did yall forget that?