But if a guy is starting with nothing by the time he buys tools , a car , engine , truck to pull with , trailer , wheels tires spares etc etc he's looking at a solid 40k even with your precious spec engine !! Non racers are going to spend that money even if they do have it. You say guys moving up from stocks ..... Those are guys who mostly build their own stuff and you want them to spend 12k to get a 525 in a car and but a store bought race car and once again all of the latemodel specific parts they need and the couple hundred dollars a night minimum it takes to race lol lol. Dude people are broke !!! You sound like a congressman talking about reducing an annual deficit from a trillion to 800 billion as a huge step !! It's still a deficit !!!!
So, SAS-LUCAS-WoO, we're all concerned about $Expensive$ Shock Systems, What about...
Collapse
X
-
Nobody would be forcing anyone to get a 525. It would be an option, that is all anyone is asking for. Nobody is saying lets replace the SLM division with a CT525 Crate division.Originally posted by hucktyson View PostBut if a guy is starting with nothing by the time he buys tools , a car , engine , truck to pull with , trailer , wheels tires spares etc etc he's looking at a solid 40k even with your precious spec engine !! Non racers are going to spend that money even if they do have it. You say guys moving up from stocks ..... Those are guys who mostly build their own stuff and you want them to spend 12k to get a 525 in a car and but a store bought race car and once again all of the latemodel specific parts they need and the couple hundred dollars a night minimum it takes to race lol lol. Dude people are broke !!! You sound like a congressman talking about reducing an annual deficit from a trillion to 800 billion as a huge step !! It's still a deficit !!!!
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
the point im trying to make, w2, is it fair that I cant afford a 15k ,by the time you buy all the gadgets that goes with it, 525 crate engine, but I do know how to recycle used parts and can build a engine for less, is it fair that I should pull 150# more weight and run a smaller spoiler? I am a ford man and don't even have a crate option. I have no problem with a crate engine , but it is an all aluminum engine and should not get any special privileges . JMO
Comment
-
It is a sealed motor making 525HP, how on earth would it even begin to keep up without any "privileges"? You can't honestly say that they should be running at the same weight with 800+HP motors.Originally posted by fastford View Postthe point im trying to make, w2, is it fair that I cant afford a 15k ,by the time you buy all the gadgets that goes with it, 525 crate engine, but I do know how to recycle used parts and can build a engine for less, is it fair that I should pull 150# more weight and run a smaller spoiler? I am a ford man and don't even have a crate option. I have no problem with a crate engine , but it is an all aluminum engine and should not get any special privileges . JMO
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
My opinion, not that anybody asked...but...super late model racing is going to become what nascar became. 30 or so teams in the country, who have a situation where money is no object, or it may even become where major sponsors are involved. No way in h.e.l.l. can the average or even above average racer continue to play super late model racer with the current costs. Its just so far put of control, and I dont see how anybody can justify spending upwards of 100k (when you include all the extras) to race weekly for 1000.00. That is completely ridiculous. I know some people do it, but no way can it continue. Crates were ruined in our area with cheating. They didnt keep people honest by teching.
The truth of the matter is....I dont care if you held a big wheel race in a wal mart parking lot, if you let them, somebodys going to roll up in a nascar hauler with a big wheel program you wont believe. I dont see anyway of fixing it. Maybe hockey puck hard tires on the local level. Problem with that is the track owners are in bed with tire manufacturing companies most of the time. I know around here supers are just about done for....and the ones left get run over when the big boys come to town.
Comment
-
Jeff what I was talking about is in my area people complained about the Cost of super late model so all tracks have dropped super late model class. So the teams that were running super regionally have now spend big $ in limited an crate because they don't have a place to run there open motors. So they went to places like Vic hill, Clements, an Cornett an are building 700hp 25,000 dollar steel head engines. An on another note local engine builders are not building open motors anymore so they have passed the cost down to the steel head guys to make up for there losses. You can get on racing junk or on here an find good fresh open motors for 10-15 thousand. A good used steel head is the same price or higher. I'd say the reason is demand there's no where to run open motors locally. An I had a 525 an I wish all you guys that think there great would go get one I was not impressed at all. An when it tears up good luck waiting 6 months for gm to fix it.
Comment
-
Nope...nobody asked for your opinion, but I am dam glad you chimed in!Originally posted by ride height View PostMy opinion, not that anybody asked...but...super late model racing is going to become what nascar became. 30 or so teams in the country, who have a situation where money is no object, or it may even become where major sponsors are involved. No way in h.e.l.l. can the average or even above average racer continue to play super late model racer with the current costs. Its just so far put of control, and I dont see how anybody can justify spending upwards of 100k (when you include all the extras) to race weekly for 1000.00. That is completely ridiculous. I know some people do it, but no way can it continue. Crates were ruined in our area with cheating. They didnt keep people honest by teching.
The truth of the matter is....I dont care if you held a big wheel race in a wal mart parking lot, if you let them, somebodys going to roll up in a nascar hauler with a big wheel program you wont believe. I dont see anyway of fixing it. Maybe hockey puck hard tires on the local level. Problem with that is the track owners are in bed with tire manufacturing companies most of the time. I know around here supers are just about done for....and the ones left get run over when the big boys come to town.
Your post is on the MONEY!!!!Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
-
where I race, when the track turns dry slick, that 800hp engine don't mean near as much as weight distribution and rear down force from a taller spoiler. just look at the limited classes, they started letting the 604 , aluminum headed crate motors run with the all steel limited engines and gave them 100# weight break and big spoiler. even though they were down 150hp, in the slick the all steel engine with less rear weight is at a huge disadvantage . I say let the crates have there own class and if you run a super with a all aluminum engine, I don't care what kind it is, you should have the same rules. this debate will go on for ever between engine builders and general motors wanting to sell there product .Originally posted by W2Racing09 View PostIt is a sealed motor making 525HP, how on earth would it even begin to keep up without any "privileges"? You can't honestly say that they should be running at the same weight with 800+HP motors.
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
That still does not solve the problem of declining SLM car counts. All that would do is fracture the Late Models into two classes running laps within a second or two of each other. Someone, somewhere will have to address this issue. They might get through this season, and maybe the next or a few more after that without any changes. But down the road tracks will not pay a $10k purse, let alone $20k for races with 18-20 cars.Originally posted by fastford View Postwhere I race, when the track turns dry slick, that 800hp engine don't mean near as much as weight distribution and rear down force from a taller spoiler. just look at the limited classes, they started letting the 604 , aluminum headed crate motors run with the all steel limited engines and gave them 100# weight break and big spoiler. even though they were down 150hp, in the slick the all steel engine with less rear weight is at a huge disadvantage . I say let the crates have there own class and if you run a super with a all aluminum engine, I don't care what kind it is, you should have the same rules. this debate will go on for ever between engine builders and general motors wanting to sell there product .
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
I'll bring this post over here, because I think Huck meant to post it here but got confused.Originally posted by hucktysonthis should end your stupidity W2 but i'm sure it wont. PPMS has offered the supr spec motor and ct 525 option for years !!!! years !!! They allow the spec a giant 12" wing and 2 nose spill boards and they let them run 1425's the ct 525 is allowed all of that plus a 14" spoiler !!!! PPMS is typically soo slick that the crate winner is usually only a 1/2 second off the super winner, the idea situation for the 525 or spec because running 1425's instead of 1600's is a HUGE advantage and guess what ????? they got SOOOOOOOOO many cars that they dropped super for weekly shows. They ended up with maybe 8 cars a night and only 1 guy bought a 525 and he's probably the richest dude to ever race a car there. Spec option , ct 525 option and No FUKING cars !!!!! Guys who run open engines don't want to race against soft tires and massive spoilers on a track that will only hold 550hp. So now what ??? They created your wet dream and ended up wit 8-10 cars a night ... I know what your going to say next because they only paid 1200 to win and 225 for 10th .... if only they paid 5k and 500 to start weekly lol lol lol when ppms has 5k to win shows with your same dream rules they pull 20-22 cars .. so now what ??? the people at the bama bash realized they would take massive losses they couldn't afford due to other conditions outside their control and chose to cut the purse before the race weekend!!! they didn't do it once everyone was there so I have no issue with it. I love how some how you sitting on the outside some how know if financial viability of paying 15K when you have none of the financial numbers to determine anything . Would you rather they pay 15 k and go out of business or go on to race another night ??? Clowns like you get off on thinking track owners should take massive losses to get your jollys off as you sit in the grand stands and stroke taffy over your crate super late wet dream that has been a miserable failure.
So, would you build a car specifically to race at only one or two tracks? I know I sure wouldn't, especially not a track as unstable as PPMS, with the other close by option equally unstable (Roaring Knob). If the engine was legal at Dog Hollow, Lernerville, Eriez, Stateline, Hagerstown, PPMS, Roaring Knob, Winchester, Marion, etc. then I suspect you would have more cars using the CT525. Not everyone is going to run out in the first year or two and buy one. It would be a slow phase in type process where new drivers would consider it an option and maybe 1/3rd of them would go that route instead of into the Crate division.
Thanks,
Jeff.Last edited by W2Racing09; 02-27-2015, 08:24 AM.
Comment
-
might get through this season ? okie dokie , when you take your white collar money you spoke of earlier and buy you a 525 and have raced a few years, ie gained some sort of experience racing on dirt, then we will discuss this again. this discussion has done been hashed over and over again on here , and I might add by people with a lot of years and experience racing dirt, and we still have no real answer of yet. I like to think things, economy in general, will get better and so will racing, good day.....Originally posted by W2Racing09 View PostThat still does not solve the problem of declining SLM car counts. All that would do is fracture the Late Models into two classes running laps within a second or two of each other. Someone, somewhere will have to address this issue. They might get through this season, and maybe the next or a few more after that without any changes. But down the road tracks will not pay a $10k purse, let alone $20k for races with 18-20 cars.
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
How does experience racing on dirt help with this discussion at all? Isn't it the drivers who repeatedly outspend themselves over and over and over in every division (from UCARS to Sprint Cars on dirt, asphalt and whatever other surface can be raced on). How is racing on asphalt so different from dirt from an economic stand point? Asphalt SLM car counts went down in my home state, so Crates were introduced. Asphalt car counts went up, asphalt car counts are still up.Originally posted by fastford View Postmight get through this season ? okie dokie , when you take your white collar money you spoke of earlier and buy you a 525 and have raced a few years, ie gained some sort of experience racing on dirt, then we will discuss this again. this discussion has done been hashed over and over again on here , and I might add by people with a lot of years and experience racing dirt, and we still have no real answer of yet. I like to think things, economy in general, will get better and so will racing, good day.....
The SLM division has one weekly track in the state and gets decent (although declining) car counts. They get a good amount of fans weekly. The rest of the tracks in the area have either gone full crate (ACT Tour) or a mixture of built and crate motors and the car counts have gone up at all tracks. I can document that if you need me to, although I expect that when confronted with proof and logic you will still disagree.
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
CJ Rayburn tried a mixed super/525 series five or six years ago where the 525 got all kinds of concessions. It failed.Originally posted by W2Racing09 View PostHow does experience racing on dirt help with this discussion at all? Isn't it the drivers who repeatedly outspend themselves over and over and over in every division (from UCARS to Sprint Cars on dirt, asphalt and whatever other surface can be raced on). How is racing on asphalt so different from dirt from an economic stand point? Asphalt SLM car counts went down in my home state, so Crates were introduced. Asphalt car counts went up, asphalt car counts are still up.
The SLM division has one weekly track in the state and gets decent (although declining) car counts. They get a good amount of fans weekly. The rest of the tracks in the area have either gone full crate (ACT Tour) or a mixture of built and crate motors and the car counts have gone up at all tracks. I can document that if you need me to, although I expect that when confronted with proof and logic you will still disagree.
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
What did he pay?Originally posted by Josh Bayko View PostCJ Rayburn tried a mixed super/525 series five or six years ago where the 525 got all kinds of concessions. It failed.
Where did they race?
Who did they race against?
I think there would be much better results if an established series allowed them. You can't try to start a new series up with all kinds of new ideas. Its the same issue where nobody trusts that it will be successful enough to make the $10k investment in a motor that can't be run anywhere else if the series fails.
Comment
-
If I remember correctly, the races mostly paid 3k to win. Most of the races were in Kentucky and Tennessee, and I'm not sure what you mean by who did they race against. That question doesn't even make sense.Originally posted by W2Racing09 View PostWhat did he pay?
Where did they race?
Who did they race against?
I think there would be much better results if an established series allowed them. You can't try to start a new series up with all kinds of new ideas. Its the same issue where nobody trusts that it will be successful enough to make the $10k investment in a motor that can't be run anywhere else if the series fails.
Comment
Comment