Charlie Kirk

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Tyy7777
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2024
    • 596

    #136
    Originally posted by lurker View Post



    You said nothing about his 2nd posting about Charlie Kirk.
    I didn't see a second post?

    Comment

    • Tyy7777
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2024
      • 596

      #137
      Originally posted by lurker View Post



      Yes —-- I do see a problem with government censorship, if that is the case.
      It's funny because there's a clip resurfacing from Trump's inauguration where he says he'll sign an executive order to stop government censorship. Guess it doesn't apply to him?

      Comment

      • Tyy7777
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2024
        • 596

        #138
        Originally posted by chathamracefan View Post

        Outside of her area, no one knew who that was. To equate that to the death of a national figure whose death appears to have been spurred on in part by vitriol coming from the highest political figures on the left seems a bit intellectually dishonest.

        There was no "get Hortman" effort going on at a national level. Her death is no less tragic or sad than Kirk's but it is not equivalent in terms of what it signifies, how it has been responded to, etc.
        It was still a politically motivated attack on a person who represents a broader platform.

        She is still a "democrat".

        Comment

        • Tyy7777
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2024
          • 596

          #139
          If any MAGA supporters get confused as to why Democrats call them weird...have a look at this.

          During Patel's hearing, Troy Nehls (R-TX) said this:

          "Charlie Kirk was a man of faith ... first and foremost, he loved his Lord Jesus, he loved his family. Beautiful wife, beautiful children. Just a remarkable honorable man that was silenced by this assassin's bullet. I would say if Charlie Kirk lived in the biblical times, he would have been the 13th disciple."

          13TH DISCIPLE!? WHAT!?

          What an embarrassment.

          Comment

          • lurker
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2017
            • 3186

            #140


            Originally posted by ss12 View Post
            Lurker, keep making assumptions and displaying your ignorance. Have a great day, and may you receive the attention you're looking for!




            It’ll be harder to display anymore ignorance than you do with your driveby attention whore Trump hate posts. You got me beat by a mile in the ignorance category.

            Comment

            • lurker
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2017
              • 3186

              #141

              Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
              If any MAGA supporters get confused as to why Democrats call them weird...have a look at this.
              Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post


              During Patel's hearing, Troy Nehls (R-TX) said this:


              "Charlie Kirk was a man of faith ... first and foremost, he loved his Lord Jesus, he loved his family. Beautiful wife, beautiful children. Just a remarkable honorable man that was silenced by this assassin's bullet. I would say if Charlie Kirk lived in the biblical times, he would have been the 13th disciple."


              13TH DISCIPLE!? WHAT!?


              What an embarrassment.


              Not really an embarrassment and not really weird by Religious or Christian standards.


              Let me explain.


              If you went to church or were in touch with Religion you’d know he’s not the first one to say that comment —--- as it’s not uncommon for someone of high regard in the Christian Faith world to be referenced as the 13th Disciple when they are deceased and probably being mourned. Not saying it's right or wrong, just pointing it out as “fact” as you don’t know or didn't understand the reference.


              Just explaining it to you. No harm, no foul?


              From Google AI

              The term "13th disciple" can refer to Matthias, the disciple chosen by the apostles to replace Judas Iscariot after his betrayal of Jesus. It can also refer to any disciple beyond the original 12, including figures like
              Paul and Mary Magdalene, or even modern-day believers who are called to follow Jesus in a profound and transformative way, embodying the disciples' journey through spiritual growth and faithfulness
              Last edited by lurker; 09-18-2025, 03:33 PM.

              Comment

              • lurker
                Senior Member
                • Dec 2017
                • 3186

                #142



                Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                It's funny because there's a clip resurfacing from Trump's inauguration where he says he'll sign an executive order to stop government censorship. Guess it doesn't apply to him?



                Not saying you are incorrect or BS’ing —--- but please share to all of us the “said” clip.


                I still do not understand why you don't cite source your comments (like the above) in the first place, from the get-go of your postings.


                In the future, please cite source all said referenced unverified to the rest of us, comments. Thanks in advance.

                Comment

                • lurker
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2017
                  • 3186

                  #143


                  Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                  —-- on a person who represents a broader platform.



                  Ty,


                  Do you really think in your right mind that Hortman had a “broader platform” than Charlie Kirk?

                  Comment

                  • Tyy7777
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2024
                    • 596

                    #144
                    Originally posted by lurker View Post



                    Not really an embarrassment and not really weird by Religious or Christian standards.


                    Let me explain.


                    If you went to church or were in touch with Religion you’d know he’s not the first one to say that comment —--- as it’s not uncommon for someone of high regard in the Christian Faith world to be referenced as the 13th Disciple when they are deceased and probably being mourned. Not saying it's right or wrong, just pointing it out as “fact” as you don’t know or didn't understand the reference.


                    Just explaining it to you. No harm, no foul?


                    From Google AI

                    [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Comic Sans MS]
                    Well lucky Congress isn't a church!

                    Whether Kirk actually expressed true Christian values or just used to justify his hatred for certain people is another story.


                    “You can safely assume you've created God in your own image when it turns out that God hates all the same people you do.” ― Anne Lamott


                    Comment

                    • Tyy7777
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2024
                      • 596

                      #145
                      Originally posted by lurker View Post





                      Not saying you are incorrect or BS’ing —--- but please share to all of us the “said” clip.


                      I still do not understand why you don't cite source your comments (like the above) in the first place, from the get-go of your postings.


                      In the future, please cite source all said referenced unverified to the rest of us, comments. Thanks in advance.
                      As I've explained, I put in more effort to my posts here than anyone else and I don't intend that as a dig but that's just the case. So it's a little bit annoying being told to do stuff like this when it's very easy to find.

                      Comment

                      • Tyy7777
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2024
                        • 596

                        #146
                        Originally posted by lurker View Post




                        Ty,


                        Do you really think in your right mind that Hortman had a “broader platform” than Charlie Kirk?
                        The answer to that question is in the quote you linked.

                        Comment

                        • Tyy7777
                          Senior Member
                          • Mar 2024
                          • 596

                          #147
                          To anyone that still isn't convinced that Trump and Co were involved in Kimmel's axing...take a look at this.

                          Brendan Carr, FCC Chair, practically said as much in a tweet. Someone pointed out that this was part of Project 2025 and Carr seemed to agree. https://x.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status/1968521297974923696

                          And if you still don't think Trump is connected with Project 2025, take a look at this. It's a Project 2025 tracker. 47% of it is completed and a further 20% is in the works.

                          A comprehensive, community-driven initiative to track the implementation of Project 2025's policy proposals

                          Comment

                          • lurker
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2017
                            • 3186

                            #148

                            Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                            As I've explained, I put in more effort to my posts here than anyone else and I don't intend that as a dig but that's just the case. So it's a little bit annoying being told to do stuff like this when it's very easy to find.



                            My comment to you was not a dig either. I’d just like for you (as you are the one saying the comment) to back up your claim, cited and sourced. You seem to always put the onus on me to find what you are talking about, but the onus is on you, not me.

                            Comment

                            • lurker
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2017
                              • 3186

                              #149


                              Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                              The answer to that question is in the quote you linked.



                              You lost me. Further if you would please.

                              Comment

                              • Tyy7777
                                Senior Member
                                • Mar 2024
                                • 596

                                #150
                                Originally posted by lurker View Post




                                You lost me. Further if you would please.
                                on a person who ***represents*** a broader platform.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X