Today's not so funny, laugh!!

[t.nie]

if Clinton signed its his

Glad to hear you think that way. Bush owns two wars, one huge big pharma payoff, the tax cut welfare checks for millionaires and billionares and the destruction of the American economy under his dictatorship.

Now you can quit laying all that crap off on Obama. He didn't have a thing to do with any of the Bush destruction of America. That was all his baby. Just like you just said, Bush signed off on it, so he owns it.

The only thing Obama owns is health care reform. And no one knows what the final cost or benefit of that is, because the majority of it hasn't become active yet. So don't even go there, half wit.

[Clayton_Wetter]

tnie, Please watch this! It should please you for sure! Must be some reason to deflect from the truth. Is this part of the reason?

http://web.gbtv.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=19851083

[LITE-INN]

oh we forgot obama is a do nothing president but he did the cash for clunkers no how is that working out for you really are better off today that you were 3 years ago and how about them gas prices food etc . I like to see a debate between GLENN BECK AND OBUMMER OR HERMAN CAIN AND THE PRES OR LAURA INGRAHM AND OBUMMER WHO IS SUPPOSE TO BE IRISH WTH?

[LITE-INN]

Now you can quit laying all that crap off on Obama. He didn't have a thing to do with any of the Bush destruction of America. That was all his baby. Just like you just said, Bush signed off on it, so he owns it.
AND OBUMMER DID NOTHING ABOUT IT

[anthonycacace]

I'm not name calling. If the shoe fits wear it. With your response, I rest my cacase!!!

Nice play on words, but why can you not answer my question(s)? I believe it is one of two reasons:

1) You know these guys did nothing to justify 'earning' (halfast's words) this much

or

2) You agree that it is too much in 'earnings' and are afraid you will be labeled the same thing you just did me.

If neither of the above apply, then please answer me this; what did these two CEOs do to receive (earn) compensation for LEAVING THEIR JOB, which is enough to keep 7,400 people working for $40,000 a year? I am not advocating or asking for a redistribution of the money, I am asking a simple question about the differing contributions of worth to a corporation here.

[LITE-INN]

why does the do nothing congressman senator even get paid just eating up our tax dollars they need toget off their azz and do something I am talkng about both parties

[bostinks]

Are you saying Clinton did not sign any of those debacles of which I said was republican as well as democrat.............and why throw "stupid" in a good debate? Did he veto it?

Check your history. You look pretty stupid saying Clinton was "allowed" by Republicans to repeal the Glass Steagal Act, when the facts clearly show it was REPUBLICANS WHO PROPOSED IT and PASSED IT. What an idiot.

However, full credit to you for realizing that the repeal of Glass Steagal, thanks to the REPUBLICANS, led to the housing bubble and subsuquent crash of the economy. Now if you could have only been right about which PARTY did all that, we could agree. But it wasn't Clinton and the Democrats, it was THE REPUBLICANS.



And NAFTA was pushed through to the very end by the original weed in the White House, George Bush, it was only signed by Clinton after he took office. Basically Clinton, while professing to support the final version of NAFTA, did make changes to what he had been handed by the Bush administration, and was the President to sign it into law. However, again, it was predominantly a REPUBLICAN endeavour:




But keep on rewriting history to suit yourselves. It sure beats facing the truth. I am just happy to see Americans finally waking up to the spin and lies spread by your kind. We will win this fight in the end, and take OUR country back from the liars and fear mongers who have dominated it and ruined it for so many for so long.

Have a nice day. Roll on 2012!

[LITE-INN]

You're pretty naive if you think you aren't paying the salaries of corporate America. They sure don't get paid in rupees but guess the big differnce the ceos fo something good for their company the US and the world unlike oh lets say speaker of the house

[LITE-INN]

talking about doing nothing

Congressional leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives have been influenced by outside consultants into looking down upon mandatory workplace verification. Their reasoning behind doing this is to keep Congress focused on "restoring jobs." Yet mandating use of a mandatory workplace verification system would open up nearly 7 million jobs nationally, and could put tens of thousands of unemployed Missouri residents back to work!

Polls have consistently shown that Americans favor replacing illegal workers with U.S. workers and passing legislation that would mandate use of a workplace verification system is the best way to make this happen. Congress needs to hear from Missouri residents of all creeds, races, sexes, religions, and political affiliations that Missouri businesses shouldn't be able to hire illegal aliens.

[kidrock]

Are you saying Clinton did not sign any of those debacles of which I said was republican as well as democrat.............and why throw "stupid" in a good debate? Did he veto it?

I'm just glad you point out it was both parties that played a part in it.

[LITE-INN]

lol found obummers real job

http://thefw.com/barack-obama-calms-crying-baby-with-presidential-magic-video/

[t.nie]

Are you saying Clinton did not sign any of those debacles of which I said was republican as well as democrat.............and why throw "stupid" in a good debate? Did he veto it?

Excuse me? You said "they (the Republicans) let Clinton pass Glass Steagal" as though Clinton was the driving force behind it! Get real! Republicans were behind it, Republicans wrote it, passed it and handed it off to Clinton who didn't have any real ability to oppose it.

Another pointless non-debate with another pointless poster on 4m. Go talk to Lite Inn, he'll believe anything you say...

[kidrock]

Yep a lot easier to pass the buck than take responsibility. At least they are good at something

[Clayton_Wetter]

[Clayton_Wetter]

Nice play on words, but why can you not answer my question(s)? I believe it is one of two reasons:

1) You know these guys did nothing to justify 'earning' (halfast's words) this much

or

2) You agree that it is too much in 'earnings' and are afraid you will be labeled the same thing you just did me.

If neither of the above apply, then please answer me this; what did these two CEOs do to receive (earn) compensation for LEAVING THEIR JOB, which is enough to keep 7,400 people working for $40,000 a year? I am not advocating or asking for a redistribution of the money, I am asking a simple question about the differing contributions of worth to a corporation here.

Do you really believe that taking money from the rich, even over salaried COE's will put one more penny in anyones pocket than the corrupt Democrats? Who will spend it on their agenda, not the people. You don't get it!! The money will still be spent as they see fit. The takeover will just get a boost as more people will be out of work and thus more people will become dependant on government. Bottom line is these corrupt politicians, the far leftist liberals need to be voted out of office. Now let's stick to the real issues!!

You just made an irrational assumption about the 7400 new workers by the way, because the previous stimulus if broken down proves what this administration does with your money.

Get your roadmap out Anthony and plot a course to Realville!!