him and tnie you can bet on it except they can't blame obamcare on him what f'n disaster that is
Prolly why I detest unions.....
Collapse
X
-
Bush administration plain lied to the congress and the American public.Originally posted by 15D View PostNope; I was pretty close to spot-on. Bush and his team laid out Ten Reasons why we went into Iraq and the reasons I laid out coincide with them.
The weapons inspectors were pulled out during the Clinton Administration because of the Iraqi's weren't allowing access and also to get them out of Harm's Way as Clinton fired nearly 300 Tomahawks into the country for obstructing the inspectors.
It was the threat of a second invasion that got the inspection teams back into country in 2002. Despite what Blix States publicly he wasn't given unconditional access or we would have known there weren't any weapons there before we invaded. The only reason we know or at least believe the weapons were destroyed is with the interviews we had with Saddam once he was in our custody. Incidentally he told the interviewers that he kept up the facade he still had the weapons to keep his enemy's at bay. Hell, his own Generals thought they still had them.
Ah yes Halliburton, the Great Satan to all those who are liberal. So, they did a job in a terrible place and was paid accordingly. I found it quite funny that they retained there position as a no-bid contractor when Obama and Company took over. Must be that they did indeed do the job they were paid to do.
Comment
-
Originally posted by 15D View PostNope; I was pretty close to spot-on. Bush and his team laid out Ten Reasons why we went into Iraq and the reasons I laid out coincide with them.
The weapons inspectors were pulled out during the Clinton Administration because of the Iraqi's weren't allowing access and also to get them out of Harm's Way as Clinton fired nearly 300 Tomahawks into the country for obstructing the inspectors.
It was the threat of a second invasion that got the inspection teams back into country in 2002. Despite what Blix States publicly he wasn't given unconditional access or we would have known there weren't any weapons there before we invaded. The only reason we know or at least believe the weapons were destroyed is with the interviews we had with Saddam once he was in our custody. Incidentally he told the interviewers that he kept up the facade he still had the weapons to keep his enemy's at bay. Hell, his own Generals thought they still had them.
Ah yes Halliburton, the Great Satan to all those who are liberal. So, they did a job in a terrible place and was paid accordingly. I found it quite funny that they retained there position as a no-bid contractor when Obama and Company took over. Must be that they did indeed do the job they were paid to do.
Comment
-
-
Nope, not even close. The intelligence community in the US and other countries were certain they had them. In the end it appears as though the did get the WMD thing wrong, but that doesn't mean they lied, it means they got it wrong. If you can't differentiate the difference, then there isn't much hope for you.Originally posted by kidrock View PostBush administration plain lied to the congress and the American public.
Comment
-
In order to qualify as a no-bid contractor they have to be approved ahead of time by Congress, which Halliburton was and continues to be. There is an exhaustive audit regime that they comply with and when they overcharge they are given fines. Whether you like it or not they are accountable.Originally posted by kidrock View Post
They have the experience and wherewithal to carry out these special contracts is why they continue to have this distinction.
Comment
-
Sorry but, they did lie just don't want to admit it..Originally posted by 15D View PostNope, not even close. The intelligence community in the US and other countries were certain they had them. In the end it appears as though the did get the WMD thing wrong, but that doesn't mean they lied, it means they got it wrong. If you can't differentiate the difference, then there isn't much hope for you.
Comment
-
You have to kidding me if you think you can trust anything that dik Chaney is involved with. That guy is not trust worthy in the least bit.Originally posted by 15D View PostIn order to qualify as a no-bid contractor they have to be approved ahead of time by Congress, which Halliburton was and continues to be. There is an exhaustive audit regime that they comply with and when they overcharge they are given fines. Whether you like it or not they are accountable.
They have the experience and wherewithal to carry out these special contracts is why they continue to have this distinction.
Comment
Comment