Originally posted by TS FAN
View Post
Drawing the old maid card
Collapse
X
-
You're way, way out in left field on this one, Kid.Originally posted by kidrock View PostFirst off I really don't care what you think of me that's first. Second Yes Donald is not very Presidential and people in the Republican party thinks the same. Yes Your right Scalia Might not have liked her speaking out but, they still would have remained good friends. And no I don't care that she spoke her Mind after all Donald does it every day and seems to be no problem there. It does not mean she still couln't rule according to the constitution. I have a feeling she not going to be around much longer and That's why she is speaking out.
Yeah I guess the hypocrisy is that the Donald can do it but, others can't
It is incumbent upon a US Supreme Court Justice to NEVER, EVER speak on the record or publicly regarding a specific political party or a specific candidate and your personal preferences. As a US Supreme Court Justice you give up that right well before you're ever nominated for the position.
I think she's really went around the bend. I can't believe someone as senile/dumb (take your pick) is still a US Supreme Court Justice. Very scary.
Comment
-
Like I said I believe she will not be around on the court much longer and that's whe she is doing it but, I think it is funny what she has said and I myself have no problrm with it, you guys do so be it that's not me. Thin skinned Donald can't take it.Originally posted by CIRF View PostYou're way, way out in left field on this one, Kid.
It is incumbent upon a US Supreme Court Justice to NEVER, EVER speak on the record or publicly regarding a specific political party or a specific candidate and your personal preferences. As a US Supreme Court Justice you give up that right well before you're ever nominated for the position.
I think she's really went around the bend. I can't believe someone as senile/dumb (take your pick) is still a US Supreme Court Justice. Very scary.
Comment
-
I'll repeat, you're way off base on this one.Originally posted by kidrock View PostLike I said I believe she will not be around on the court much longer and that's whe she is doing it but, I think it is funny what she has said and I myself have no problrm with it, you guys do so be it that's not me. Thin skinned Donald can't take it.
It's not about being thin skinned, it's what is, and should be, expected in regards to the responsibilities of a US Supreme Court Justice. It makes no difference if she's been a justice for 30 minutes or is 30 minutes away from retiring.
This situation is much more ethically degrading than the US Attorney General having a private meeting with the former rapist in chief.
Kid, if you're going to applaud this serious breach of protocol then you really need to brush up on high court ethics. Just because you enjoy hearing what she said doesn't mean your not completely off the reservation.
Bottom line is you're dead wrong on this one and you should be intelligent enough understand it.
Comment
-
Like I said i have no problem with it and I'm sure if Roberts, Thomas, Alito said somethng about Clinton you guys would not be saying the same thing and you would be loving it just like I am now that the Notorious RBG has spoken out against trump.
Like I said just because she has spoken out does not mean she still can't rule according to the constitution
Comment
-
You're completely wrong on this one, Kid. There is 240 years of precedence to back up the fact that you're wrong.
You're also wrong about saying that I'd be applauding one of the conservative justices admonishing the rapist enabler and defender. I would be just as critical of anyone of them if they did what the old bag did, and I mean that.
It can't be said enough, your totally wrong on this one!
Comment
-
She is so ugly that Bill Clinton would love to bang her !!Originally posted by TS FAN View PostBill O'reilly let out a scream when John Stoshel (spelling?) sprung a surprise picture of her on his show. He was asking Bill if he knew who these people were. It was obviously not planned and hilarious.
Comment
-
Boy that should tell you something about your candidate then if this was the first judge to speak out about a presidential candidate doesn't it. No wonder some aren't even going to the convention.Originally posted by CIRF View PostYou're completely wrong on this one, Kid. There is 240 years of precedence to back up the fact that you're wrong.
You're also wrong about saying that I'd be applauding one of the conservative justices admonishing the rapist enabler and defender. I would be just as critical of anyone of them if they did what the old bag did, and I mean that.
It can't be said enough, your totally wrong on this one!
Good them I'm wrong but, I still love it oh thin skinned got a good taste of his own medicine.
Comment
-
-
Comment