Drawing the old maid card

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • kidrock
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 16407

    #16
    Originally posted by TS FAN View Post
    Kid you have got to be kidding on this matter. Do you even know what the Supreme Court represents?
    Do you know why I said it has become useless and should be terminated? I would be disgusted if Justice Thomas came out and bashed Clinton. Are you starting to understand this?
    Well that's you and not me. I have no problem with it after all Donald is not the President just a candidate.

    Comment

    • CIRF
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 8122

      #17
      Originally posted by kidrock View Post
      First off I really don't care what you think of me that's first. Second Yes Donald is not very Presidential and people in the Republican party thinks the same. Yes Your right Scalia Might not have liked her speaking out but, they still would have remained good friends. And no I don't care that she spoke her Mind after all Donald does it every day and seems to be no problem there. It does not mean she still couln't rule according to the constitution. I have a feeling she not going to be around much longer and That's why she is speaking out.

      Yeah I guess the hypocrisy is that the Donald can do it but, others can't
      You're way, way out in left field on this one, Kid.

      It is incumbent upon a US Supreme Court Justice to NEVER, EVER speak on the record or publicly regarding a specific political party or a specific candidate and your personal preferences. As a US Supreme Court Justice you give up that right well before you're ever nominated for the position.

      I think she's really went around the bend. I can't believe someone as senile/dumb (take your pick) is still a US Supreme Court Justice. Very scary.

      Comment

      • kidrock
        Senior Member
        • May 2007
        • 16407

        #18
        Originally posted by CIRF View Post
        You're way, way out in left field on this one, Kid.

        It is incumbent upon a US Supreme Court Justice to NEVER, EVER speak on the record or publicly regarding a specific political party or a specific candidate and your personal preferences. As a US Supreme Court Justice you give up that right well before you're ever nominated for the position.

        I think she's really went around the bend. I can't believe someone as senile/dumb (take your pick) is still a US Supreme Court Justice. Very scary.
        Like I said I believe she will not be around on the court much longer and that's whe she is doing it but, I think it is funny what she has said and I myself have no problrm with it, you guys do so be it that's not me. Thin skinned Donald can't take it.

        Comment

        • CIRF
          Senior Member
          • Jul 2007
          • 8122

          #19
          Originally posted by kidrock View Post
          Like I said I believe she will not be around on the court much longer and that's whe she is doing it but, I think it is funny what she has said and I myself have no problrm with it, you guys do so be it that's not me. Thin skinned Donald can't take it.
          I'll repeat, you're way off base on this one.

          It's not about being thin skinned, it's what is, and should be, expected in regards to the responsibilities of a US Supreme Court Justice. It makes no difference if she's been a justice for 30 minutes or is 30 minutes away from retiring.

          This situation is much more ethically degrading than the US Attorney General having a private meeting with the former rapist in chief.

          Kid, if you're going to applaud this serious breach of protocol then you really need to brush up on high court ethics. Just because you enjoy hearing what she said doesn't mean your not completely off the reservation.

          Bottom line is you're dead wrong on this one and you should be intelligent enough understand it.

          Comment

          • kidrock
            Senior Member
            • May 2007
            • 16407

            #20
            Like I said i have no problem with it and I'm sure if Roberts, Thomas, Alito said somethng about Clinton you guys would not be saying the same thing and you would be loving it just like I am now that the Notorious RBG has spoken out against trump.

            Like I said just because she has spoken out does not mean she still can't rule according to the constitution

            Comment

            • old fan
              Banned
              • Jan 2016
              • 4191

              #21
              yes I would, that position should not be party driven

              Comment

              • kidrock
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 16407

                #22
                Originally posted by old fan View Post
                yes I would, that position should not be party driven
                Liar, you guys would be loving it and you know it. I would love it. Probably what she needs to knock her down a notch or two

                Comment

                • old fan
                  Banned
                  • Jan 2016
                  • 4191

                  #23
                  not giving a ratz behind that position is not or should be party driven how can she a judge if she is parial to one side or the other besides at 85 its time for the ole bag to retire

                  Comment

                  • CIRF
                    Senior Member
                    • Jul 2007
                    • 8122

                    #24
                    You're completely wrong on this one, Kid. There is 240 years of precedence to back up the fact that you're wrong.

                    You're also wrong about saying that I'd be applauding one of the conservative justices admonishing the rapist enabler and defender. I would be just as critical of anyone of them if they did what the old bag did, and I mean that.

                    It can't be said enough, your totally wrong on this one!

                    Comment

                    • Raceready
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2015
                      • 4737

                      #25
                      Originally posted by TS FAN View Post
                      Bill O'reilly let out a scream when John Stoshel (spelling?) sprung a surprise picture of her on his show. He was asking Bill if he knew who these people were. It was obviously not planned and hilarious.
                      She is so ugly that Bill Clinton would love to bang her !!

                      Comment

                      • kidrock
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2007
                        • 16407

                        #26
                        Originally posted by CIRF View Post
                        You're completely wrong on this one, Kid. There is 240 years of precedence to back up the fact that you're wrong.

                        You're also wrong about saying that I'd be applauding one of the conservative justices admonishing the rapist enabler and defender. I would be just as critical of anyone of them if they did what the old bag did, and I mean that.

                        It can't be said enough, your totally wrong on this one!
                        Boy that should tell you something about your candidate then if this was the first judge to speak out about a presidential candidate doesn't it. No wonder some aren't even going to the convention.

                        Good them I'm wrong but, I still love it oh thin skinned got a good taste of his own medicine.

                        Comment

                        • old fan
                          Banned
                          • Jan 2016
                          • 4191

                          #27
                          she a 85 yr old senile ole lady

                          Comment

                          • kidrock
                            Senior Member
                            • May 2007
                            • 16407

                            #28
                            Originally posted by old fan View Post
                            she a 85 yr old senile ole lady
                            And she told Donald what she thought of him gotta love it. Donald gets a taste of his own medicine and he can't handle it lol

                            By the way she's hardly senile
                            Last edited by kidrock; 07-13-2016, 10:54 PM.

                            Comment

                            • skids
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2007
                              • 1003

                              #29
                              Originally posted by kidrock View Post
                              Well that's you and not me. I have no problem with it after all Donald is not the President just a candidate.
                              Thanks for making my point.
                              Trump is just a candidate. She is a Supreme Court Justice!!
                              Why can't you see the difference?

                              Comment

                              • old fan
                                Banned
                                • Jan 2016
                                • 4191

                                #30
                                Originally posted by Raceready View Post
                                She is so ugly that Bill Clinton would love to bang her !!
                                Clinton would bang a dirty bed sheet lol

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X